![]() In a variety of surgical procedures, especially in the field of visceral surgery, gynecology, or urology, robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is seen as an undisputed standard. The question of financial reimbursement is still not answered and the systems on the market still require some specific improvements for the use in head and neck surgery. Most studies include small case series or lack a control arm which enables a comparison with established standard procedures. Our findings show a lack of large-scale systematic randomized trials on the use of robots in head and neck surgery. The results were structured according to anatomical regions, for the topics “Costs,” “current clinical trials,” and “robotic research” we added separate sections for the sake of clarity. For this purpose, we conducted a systematic review of trials published between 20, as well as currently ongoing trials registered in. In this review, we evaluate to what extent RAS can potentially be applied in head and neck surgery, in which fields it is already daily routine and what advantages can be seen in comparison to conventional surgery. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in the field of head and neck surgery has not been clearly established. In the past few years, surgical robots have recently entered the medical field, particularly in urology, gynecology, and general surgery.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |